It strikes me that the architecture of mosques is quite democratic. A open space exists for all (well really just men). During worship, everyone faces toward Mecca but otherwise there is no real focal ploint...the worship area is filled (if it is a good design) with light. A pulpit, usually modest, provides a place for the imam to lecture at the principle times of worship. But the design is circular...everyone can see everyone at the same time.
-
Cathedrals, though, are designed for everyone to face the same way. Long vaulted space leads the worshiper to face the front (where all the action is going on). The focus is on what the guys (mostly always guys in really neat robes) in front are doing...seats are set up so that all worshipers face front during the whole time of the service. And while the design, in part, is to draw the worshipers eyes upard, the placement of the seats mainly ensures the eyes stay focused on the altar.
I think this traditional basilica architecture reinforces hierarchy in part, the separation of worshipers from those who conduct or carry out the formal worship. It also reinforces a sense of hierarchy, those who watch or "participate" from those who actually carry it out. On the other hand, men and women can participate equally...Even as priests in some of these cathedrals...converted from Catholic to Protestant. Still In the mosque the architecture seems to reinforce the concept of all occupying the same space, being in the worship and not necessarily having anyone in charge to "conduct" the sacred actions. And who knows but someday men and women may worship there together.
I am not sure of this...it is probably just the result of moving between "islamic" and "christian" cultures...but, then, that is why we travel, no?
Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Location:On the train to Hamburg
